#BLACK HOLE REAL FULL#

But that solution contained a peculiar feature: the theory behaved strangely at a specific radius, known today as the Schwarzschild radius. He was trying to find the solution to the gravitational pull of a single, solitary, symmetric ball of matter - such as the sun at the center of our solar system. This item was written with the assistance of AiGвЂ™s research team.Physicist Karl Schwarzschild accidentally discovered black holes in 1916, when he was figuring out a particular solution to Einstein's general theory of relativity. Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying, FaulknerвЂ™s fascinating DVD Things That Go Bump In The NightВ to learn how black holes, dark matter, and dark energy fit into the universe God created.

#BLACK HOLE REAL FULL#

Also, our reviewВ and discussion guide for Cosmos: вЂњA Sky Full of GhostsвЂќ also explores the nature of black holes. FaulknerвЂ™s entire blog youвЂ™ll be better informed as you discuss this interesting controversy about black holes with your friends. This is why I emphasized this important teaching during my recent debate with Bill Nye вЂњthe Science Guy.вЂќ Of course, if evolutionists like Nye admitted that molecules-to-man evolution was in the realm of historical science, then they would have to admit they hold beliefs! And these secularists donвЂ™t want to admit this conclusion-they want to keep indoctrinating generations of people to believe molecules-to-man evolution is fact! Faulkner is right-these scientists donвЂ™t understand the difference between observational science and historical science. However, the scientists quoted above canвЂ™t see how a black hole formed, so they now propose denying their existence! Secular scientists canвЂ™t observe how life supposedly formed from non-life by natural processes and how it supposedly evolved over millions of years-yet they believe it happened and propose a story as to how they think it happened. Perhaps the subject of black holes can help some people understand that, as with evolution, the existence and observable behavior of something does not reveal its unobserved, untestable origin in the unobservable past. As a creation scientist, I have no problem with God miraculously making black holes during the Creation Week, nor do I have a problem with black holes forming today through natural processes that God has ordained.Д®volutionists believe that evolution must have happened because life exists and, they think, could have come to exist in no other way. Rather, scientists develop ideas based upon what science they know to explain how such things could have come about, but there is no way to test these ideas, because they happened in the past. The question of where black holes come from is an entirely different issue, one that experimental/observational science cannot address. This is experimental/observational science. As I show in a DVD about black holes, there is very good evidence that black holes exist. Many people, including creationists, confuse the origin of black holes with the science of black holes. Even though the laws of physics as presently understood struggle to explain what is going on in a black hole as well as how they form, astronomers can know that black holes exist from the observable way they affect other things.Дr. Unseen black holes at the centers of galaxies would explain much of the observable behavior of objects and gases near the center of various galaxies. Faulkner, whose primary research concerns binary stars, tell us that stellar black holes can be part of binary star systems, and their presence, though unseen, explains the behavior of their companion stars. Since we cannot observe the historical origins of a black hole, we actually cannot know how they formed! But that does not change the fact that they exist.ДЄstronomers like Dr. Therefore, she proposes they do not exist. The scientist in North Carolina does not believe that stellar black holes could form the way scientists believe they formed. But the root of the problem, he says, is a confusion of observational and historical science. Danny Faulkner explains in his blog this week, much of the difficulty lies in our incomplete understanding of the physics that explains the nature of all matter and energy, great and small. Stephen Hawking and a scientist from the University of North Carolina have proposed that black holes, at least as we understand them, arenвЂ™t really there. So if that is the case, why have two secular scientists now claimed that black holes might not even exist? Both Dr. Astronomers are able to see the effects of their enormous gravity on other things in space. Even though we cannot вЂњseeвЂќ black holes the way we see a star or the moon, there is overwhelming observational evidence that they do exist.

A black hole, as you probably know, is so massive and dense that even light cannot escape from its enormous gravity, so it is invisible. Black holes form the background in many science fiction stories.

Black hole real